I’m not completely sure, however, from what i got was that being lesbian was seen as an act of rebellion against males, both white and black. Even though it seemed as though it was mostly directed towards white males, it seemed to be more “disrespectful” towards black men because they were no longer slaves they felt as if they needed to enslave black women in a sense. And if women were not interested in black men how they felt they were not able to oppress and belittle someone as they once were.
Another thing cheryl clarke did was compare being seen as lesbian or straight to embracing your race. “..labels herself bisexual….who calls herself “mulatto” rather than black” (page 244, clarke). Instead of embracing what they really are many women felt that they should play the role of a woman and classify themselves as other what people believe is “right”. “many women are only lesbians to a particular community and pass as heterosexuals as they traffic among enemies.” (page 243, clarke). Women walked around pretending to be something they truly were not around people they are fighting against.
I see a lot of this around in my community in California and even on campus. people feel as though because other thinks its taboo to be or act a certain why they should have to pretend and do something they not. When they should be showing them who they really are to show that they are no different then them and they do not care how they are seen because at the end of the day they are who they are.